Any attempt to mend an injury – however necessary – doesn’t often achieve a complete restoration of what’s been damaged. Repairs never quite return things to a “good as new” status. On a personal level, all of us have some scar tissue that demonstrates this truth. From a broader, economic perspective, the various safety nets and policy remedies offered by the government – while important to many in agriculture – can’t fully replace the loss of markets and income.
The latest example of this dynamic is the program the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) created this summer to compensate dairy farmers for the revenue they’ve lost due to the retaliatory tariffs imposed by Mexico and China. Farm-level milk prices had just started their seasonal and expected upward movement this spring, but cash and futures prices did an abrupt about-face once tariffs were announced on exports to our top two foreign markets. NMPF calculated that farmers’ milk prices took a hit of $1.65/cwt., which if conditions don’t fully improve, will deprive them of $1.8 billion in projected revenue in the last half of 2018. That’s a very deep wound, compounded by an already challenging market situation.
To its credit, USDA acknowledged that the ongoing tariff conflicts affect farmers of many different commodities, and announced efforts to provide compensation. NMPF told USDA that the remedy should center on direct payments to producers and incorporate assistance to exporters facing a reduction in sales. When the department announced its tariff mitigation package last month, the good news was that the agency followed the suggestions we provided in terms of how to administer the aid. But the very bad news for dairy farmers is that the amount of aid – $127 million in direct payments – is a tiny bandage atop a very deep wound.
We have been clear with USDA that dairy farmers are not satisfied with compensation that falls significantly short of where markets were headed earlier this summer, based on all major analytical forecasts prior to the announcement of the retaliatory tariffs. We will continue to share our misgivings with administration officials and our allies on Capitol Hill.
As the USDA announced the tariff mitigation package, we also saw significant progress on the underlying source of the retaliatory tariffs: the strained trade relationship with Mexico. On the same day the farm assistance package was announced, the Trump Administration also touted an agreement in principle with Mexico on an updated deal over the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). While that’s good news overall, there are some important details that remain unresolved, especially Mexico’s treatment of cheeses made in the United States and sold in Mexico. What’s more, the agreement did not include lifting the 20%-25% tariffs on our dairy exports to Mexico, tariffs that are harming farm prices in the United States.
Meanwhile, the Farm Bill negotiations continued during the late summer, and have kicked into high gear in September, with the goal of getting a new bill passed by the end of this month. The slight differences in the dairy policy elements of the House and Senate versions of the bill should be fairly easily reconciled, and the final product will give America’s milk producers a better and more effective safety net than was established in the 2014 bill.
Of course, the reality is that, at best, the Farm Bill can only offer a modest back stop for agricultural producers. The same is true of this summer’s trade assistance package. The real driver of the future health of our industry is expanding existing markets – at home and abroad – and building new ones. In addition to revising NAFTA, we need to create new agreements with other nations to reach more consumers around the world with our foods. Opportunities for new growth are the best medicine for the afflictions farmers have suffered this year.
